Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Celeron E3300
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.5 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.5 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
1067a
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
May 2021
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
2.9k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
6.38k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
2.59k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.08k (x0.59)
TOTAL
16.53k
12.94k (x0.78)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
5.76k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
12.67k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
5.16k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
1.01k (x0.36)
TOTAL
37k
24.6k (x0.66)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4