Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.3 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.3 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
100f63
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Regor
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
-
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
kB
Date
May 2021
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
260
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
6.04k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
6.2k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
3.11k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.7k (x0.94)
TOTAL
16.53k
17.05k (x1.03)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
260
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
10.02k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
10.18k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
5.1k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
2.25k (x0.79)
TOTAL
37k
27.54k (x0.74)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
260
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4