Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs E Series E-350
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 3.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 3.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
500f10
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Zacate
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
-
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
10.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
1.78k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
2.33k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
1.41k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
0.74k (x0.41)
TOTAL
16.53k
6.26k (x0.38)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
2.84k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
3.89k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
2.42k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
0.9k (x0.32)
TOTAL
37k
10.05k (x0.27)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4