Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The T4500 is based on Core architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 23 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 5.4 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 23 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 5.4 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
206c2
Core
Penryn-3M
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2010
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.07k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
23.03k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
8.77k (x3.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
5.82k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.47k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
2.98k (x2.51)
TOTAL
12.07k
21.04k (x1.74)
Multithread
T4500
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
5.27k
53.23k (x10.11)
Test#2 (FP)
11.69k
39.35k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
27.05k (x5.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
5.28k (x3.93)
TOTAL
23.03k
124.92k (x5.42)
Performance/W
T4500
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
150 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
135 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
658 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1144 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
5246 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4