Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
Both models T4500 and E8200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 23 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.1 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 23 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.1 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Penryn-3M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2010
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.07k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
23.03k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
6.62k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.55k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
3.6k (x3.03)
TOTAL
12.07k
15.77k (x1.31)
Multithread
T4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.27k
5.83k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
11.69k
12.64k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
4.97k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.95k (x1.45)
TOTAL
23.03k
25.39k (x1.1)
Performance/W
T4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
150 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
135 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
658 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1144 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
5246 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4