Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Celeron N4020
Description
The T4500 is based on Core architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.1 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.1 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a8
Core
Penryn-3M
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2010
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
12.06k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.71k points
25.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.25k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
5.19k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
2.56k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
1.61k (x1.32)
TOTAL
10.96k
10.61k (x0.97)
Multithread
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
1.68k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
10.61k
7.29k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.51k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
1.29k (x0.97)
TOTAL
20.52k
13.78k (x0.67)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.64k
5.14k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
7.89k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.76k (x1.48)
TOTAL
12.06k
17.67k (x1.46)
Multithread
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
5.21k
7.46k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
11.52k
11.61k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.27k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
1.91k (x1.43)
TOTAL
22.71k
25.26k (x1.11)
Performance/W
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
149 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
329 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
649 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1147 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2555 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
517 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
5245 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4