| | | | | | |

Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Celeron E3300


Description
Both models T4500 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 23 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.1 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2010
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
12.07k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
23.03k points
24.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T4500
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.11k
2.29k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
5.87k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
2.49k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.01k (x0.83)
TOTAL
10.99k
11.66k (x1.06)

Multithread

T4500

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.57k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
10.75k
11.66k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.89k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.04k (x0.77)
TOTAL
20.83k
22.16k (x1.06)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.9k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
6.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.59k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.08k (x0.91)
TOTAL
12.07k
12.94k (x1.07)

Multithread

T4500

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.27k
5.76k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.69k
12.67k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.16k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.01k (x0.75)
TOTAL
23.03k
24.6k (x1.07)

Performance/W
T4500
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
150 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
135 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
658 points/W
378 points/W

Performance/GHz
T4500
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1144 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5246 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4