Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The T4500 is based on Core architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
300f10
Core
Penryn-3M
Llano
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2010
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.06k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.71k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.64k
3.98k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
4k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.05k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.37k (x1.15)
TOTAL
12.06k
11.4k (x0.95)
Multithread
T4500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
5.21k
5.74k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.52k
6.05k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
2.85k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
1.86k (x1.39)
TOTAL
22.71k
16.5k (x0.73)
Performance/W
T4500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
149 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
329 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
649 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1147 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2555 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
517 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5245 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4