Pentium E5500 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The E5500 is based on Core architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 123.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 6 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 123.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 6 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
406f1
Core
Wolfdale
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2010
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
12.77k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.69k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5500
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
2.6k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
7.55k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.61k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.03k (x2.23)
TOTAL
12.77k
14.79k (x1.16)
Multithread
E5500
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
17.41k (x4.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.8k
75.46k (x6.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.7k
26.25k (x5.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
4.65k (x5.33)
TOTAL
20.69k
123.78k (x5.98)
Performance/W
E5500
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
888 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
13 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
318 points/W
1456 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5500
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
868 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2335 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
676 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
4931 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4