Pentium E5500 vs E Series E-350
Description
The E5500 is based on Core architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the E-350 gets 8.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 2.5 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the E-350 gets 8.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 2.5 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
500f10
Core
Wolfdale
Zacate
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Date
April 2010
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.77k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.69k points
10.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5500
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
0.83k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
2.38k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
1.41k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.75k (x0.82)
TOTAL
12.77k
5.37k (x0.42)
Multithread
E5500
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
1.45k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
10.8k
3.97k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.7k
2.18k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
0.82k (x0.94)
TOTAL
20.69k
8.42k (x0.41)
Performance/W
E5500
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
81 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
221 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
13 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
318 points/W
468 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5500
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
519 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2335 points/GHz
1488 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
466 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
3355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4