Pentium E5500 vs A9 9420
Description
The E5500 is based on Core architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the 9420 gets 18.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the 9420 gets 18.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
670f00
Core
Wolfdale
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
April 2010
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
12.77k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.69k points
46.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5500
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
2.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
9.97k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.96k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.12k (x2.33)
TOTAL
12.77k
17.61k (x1.38)
Multithread
E5500
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.88k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
10.8k
9.26k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.7k
3.9k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
1.74k (x1.99)
TOTAL
20.69k
18.79k (x0.91)
Performance/W
E5500
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
617 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
260 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
13 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
318 points/W
1253 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5500
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2335 points/GHz
2769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
821 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
590 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
4892 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4