| | | | | | |

Pentium Dual-Core E5400 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The E5400 is based on Core architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5400 gets a score of 26.8 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 1.4 times faster than the E5400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
506e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2009
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
14.01k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.78k points
37.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5400
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2.47k
0.7k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
6.37k
2.8k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
0.85k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.24k
1.88k (x1.52)
TOTAL
12.75k
6.23k (x0.49)

Multithread

E5400

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
4.95k
2.74k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
12.7k
12.87k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
3.89k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
6.03k (x4.99)
TOTAL
24.2k
25.52k (x1.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5400
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
2.59k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
6.94k
3.94k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
1k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
2k (x1.64)
TOTAL
14.01k
9.52k (x0.68)

Multithread

E5400

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
6.18k
10.4k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
13.82k
16.64k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
4.51k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
6.33k (x5.25)
TOTAL
26.78k
37.88k (x1.41)

Performance/W
E5400
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
95 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
412 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5400
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1143 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
450 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
5187 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4