Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The E5200 (R0) is based on Core architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 7.3 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 7.3 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
406f1
Core
Wolfdale
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2008
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
2.6k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
5.9k
7.55k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.47k
2.61k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
2.03k (x1.67)
TOTAL
11.89k
14.79k (x1.24)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
17.41k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
10.62k
75.46k (x7.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
26.25k (x5.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
4.65k (x2.55)
TOTAL
22.03k
123.78k (x5.62)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
8.22k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
12.06k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
4.01k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
2.89k (x2.38)
TOTAL
13.08k
27.18k (x2.08)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
61.34k (x10.69)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
90.21k (x7.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
26.2k (x5.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
4.62k (x3.86)
TOTAL
24.89k
182.37k (x7.33)
Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4