| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (R0) vs 4415U


Description
The E5200 (R0) is based on Core architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 2.3 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
806e9
Core
Wolfdale
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2008
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
2.34k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
5.9k
9.51k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.47k
3.05k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
2.59k (x2.13)
TOTAL
11.89k
17.49k (x1.47)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.71k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.62k
21.73k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
7.35k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
2.43k (x1.33)
TOTAL
22.03k
36.22k (x1.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
8.29k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
11.82k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
3.09k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
4.18k (x3.45)
TOTAL
13.08k
27.39k (x2.09)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
17.24k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
27.4k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
7.44k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
4.31k (x3.6)
TOTAL
24.89k
56.39k (x2.27)

Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4