Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
Both models E5200 (R0) and Q6600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
6fb
Core
Wolfdale
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2008
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
2.78k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
2.49k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
2.37k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
1.29k (x1.07)
TOTAL
13.08k
8.92k (x0.68)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
10.9k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
9.79k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
9.11k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
0.84k (x0.7)
TOTAL
24.89k
30.64k (x1.23)
Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4