Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
Both models E5200 (R0) and E8200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2008
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
3k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
6.62k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
2.55k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
3.6k (x2.97)
TOTAL
13.08k
15.77k (x1.21)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.83k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
12.64k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.97k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.95k (x1.63)
TOTAL
24.89k
25.39k (x1.02)
Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4