| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Core 2 Duo E7200


Description
Both models E5200 (R0) and E7200 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E7200 is 1 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
25.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
2.33k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
5.9k
5.96k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.47k
2.5k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
1.45k (x1.2)
TOTAL
11.89k
12.23k (x1.03)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.65k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.62k
11.87k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
5.01k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.23k (x0.68)
TOTAL
22.03k
22.76k (x1.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
2.93k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
6.48k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
2.6k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
1.45k (x1.2)
TOTAL
13.08k
13.46k (x1.03)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.85k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
12.91k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.22k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.23k (x1.03)
TOTAL
24.89k
25.21k (x1.01)

Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
388 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4