Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Core 2 Duo E6550
Description
Both models E5200 (R0) and E6550 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
6fb
Core
Wolfdale
Conroe
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2008
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
10.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
16.38k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
2.34k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
5.9k
2.34k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.47k
2.35k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
2.72k (x2.24)
TOTAL
11.89k
9.75k (x0.82)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.67k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.62k
4.68k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
4.71k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.26k (x0.69)
TOTAL
22.03k
15.32k (x0.7)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
2.7k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
2.43k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
2.44k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
2.74k (x2.26)
TOTAL
13.08k
10.31k (x0.79)
Multithread
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.39k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
4.85k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.89k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.26k (x1.05)
TOTAL
24.89k
16.38k (x0.66)
Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
83 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
75 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
75 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
252 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
4417 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4