| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (R0) vs Celeron J4105


Description
The E5200 (R0) is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (R0) gets a score of 24.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.5 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a1
Core
Wolfdale
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2008
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.89k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
1.68k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
5.9k
5.29k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.47k
2.75k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
3.44k (x2.83)
TOTAL
11.89k
13.16k (x1.11)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
6.39k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
10.62k
20.02k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
10.22k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
4.94k (x2.71)
TOTAL
22.03k
41.57k (x1.89)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (R0)
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.87k
4.9k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
6.42k
7.26k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.58k
2.75k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
3.32k (x2.74)
TOTAL
13.08k
18.22k (x1.39)

Multithread

E5200 (R0)

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
18.84k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
12.78k
27.45k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
10.35k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
4.85k (x4.05)
TOTAL
24.89k
61.49k (x2.47)

Performance/W
E5200 (R0)
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
88 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
383 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (R0)
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1033 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5232 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4