Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Description
Both models E5200 (M0) and E2180 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E2180 gets 13.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.6 times faster than the E2180 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E2180 gets 13.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.6 times faster than the E2180 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
6fd
Core
Wolfdale
Allendale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2008
August 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
7.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
13.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
2.31k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
2.08k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.1k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.06k (x0.79)
TOTAL
13.08k
7.55k (x0.58)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
4.57k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
4.11k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
4.14k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.07k (x1.02)
TOTAL
22.02k
13.89k (x0.63)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
70 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
63 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
64 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
214 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
3777 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4