| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (M0) vs N3530


Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.

Summarizing, the N3530 is 1.6 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
30678
Core
Wolfdale
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2008
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
34.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
4.86k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
2.5k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
1.82k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.26k (x0.93)
TOTAL
13.08k
10.44k (x0.8)

Multithread

E5200 (M0)

N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
17.22k (x3.16)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
8.89k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
6.89k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.57k (x1.5)
TOTAL
22.02k
34.57k (x1.57)

Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
4938 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4