Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core 2 Duo T6600
Description
Both models E5200 (M0) and T6600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2008
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
11.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
20.63k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
2.55k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
5.59k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.26k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
0.75k (x0.56)
TOTAL
13.08k
11.15k (x0.85)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
4.9k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
10.71k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
4.33k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
0.69k (x0.66)
TOTAL
22.02k
20.63k (x0.94)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
306 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
124 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
589 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
2539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
341 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
5068 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4