| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core i7-6600U


Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i7-6600U gets 48.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6600U is 2.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
406e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2008
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
79.22k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
6.76k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
9.58k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.46k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
4.18k (x3.1)
TOTAL
13.08k
22.99k (x1.76)

Multithread

E5200 (M0)

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
14.37k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
23.79k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
5.71k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
4.29k (x4.09)
TOTAL
22.02k
48.16k (x2.19)

Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
958 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
1586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
286 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
3211 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
724 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
1229 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
6761 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4