| | | | | | |

Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 1.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
40651
Core
Wolfdale
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
46.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
6.7k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
5.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.65k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
2.13k (x1.58)
TOTAL
13.08k
17.47k (x1.34)

Multithread

E5200 (M0)

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
14.3k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
13.83k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
6.12k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
2.48k (x2.37)
TOTAL
22.02k
36.74k (x1.67)

Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
2449 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4