Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Description
Both models E5200 (M0) and E2160 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.7 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.7 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
6f2
Core
Wolfdale
Allendale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2008
June 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
7k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
12.87k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
2.08k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
1.88k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
1.89k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.16k (x0.86)
TOTAL
13.08k
7k (x0.54)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
4.16k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
3.74k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
3.78k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.19k (x1.13)
TOTAL
22.02k
12.87k (x0.58)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
198 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4