Xeon W-2223 vs Core i9-10900X
Description
Both models W-2223 and i9-10900X are based on Cascade Lake architecture.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.6 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.6 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
50657
Core
Glacier Falls
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
120 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
19712 kB
Date
October 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
25.97k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
22.37k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.3k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.63k (x0.98)
TOTAL
59.68k
62.28k (x1.04)
Multithread
W-2223
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
281.98k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
259.01k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
64.87k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
26.5k (x3.85)
TOTAL
243.18k
632.35k (x2.6)
Performance/W
W-2223
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4