Xeon W-2223 vs Core i7-10700
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0655
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
16386 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
30.66k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
25.64k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.98k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
12.25k (x1.4)
TOTAL
59.68k
74.53k (x1.25)
Multithread
W-2223
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
240.28k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
234.3k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
56.12k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
7.02k (x1.02)
TOTAL
243.18k
537.73k (x2.21)
Performance/W
W-2223
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4