| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i7-10610U


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
23.1k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
20k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.61k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.94k (x1.02)
TOTAL
59.68k
56.65k (x0.95)

Multithread

W-2223

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
73.36k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
68.28k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
13.73k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.62k (x0.96)
TOTAL
243.18k
162k (x0.67)

Performance/W
W-2223
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4