Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-8259U
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
806ea
Core
Glacier Falls
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
21.06k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
19.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.72k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.98k (x1.02)
TOTAL
59.68k
54.55k (x0.91)
Multithread
W-2223
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
96.43k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
85.46k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
22.31k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
24.81k (x3.6)
TOTAL
243.18k
229k (x0.94)
Performance/W
W-2223
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4