Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-10600K
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.5 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.5 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0655
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
352.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
30.11k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
26.16k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
6.01k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
10.77k (x1.23)
TOTAL
59.68k
73.05k (x1.22)
Multithread
W-2223
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
158.82k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
150.39k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
36.56k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
7.11k (x1.03)
TOTAL
243.18k
352.88k (x1.45)
Performance/W
W-2223
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
2823 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4