| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
706e5
Core
Glacier Falls
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
4.05k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
15.29k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
9.04k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
10.54k (x1.29)
TOTAL
31.45k
38.92k (x1.24)

Multithread

W-2223

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
9.05k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
33.88k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
15.34k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.74k (x0.98)
TOTAL
104.51k
65.01k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
25.53k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
19.99k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
9.31k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
10.81k (x1.23)
TOTAL
59.68k
65.64k (x1.1)

Multithread

W-2223

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
58.46k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
57.31k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
20.1k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.81k (x0.99)
TOTAL
243.18k
142.69k (x0.59)

Performance/W
W-2223
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4