Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
23.11k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
20.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.73k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
7.43k (x0.85)
TOTAL
59.68k
55.86k (x0.94)
Multithread
W-2223
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
65.84k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
60.77k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
14.45k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
4.44k (x0.65)
TOTAL
243.18k
145.51k (x0.6)
Performance/W
W-2223
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4