Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0652
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
26.37k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
23.91k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.57k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
11.68k (x1.33)
TOTAL
59.68k
67.53k (x1.13)
Multithread
W-2223
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
114.08k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
114.71k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
27.33k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
4.25k (x0.62)
TOTAL
243.18k
260.38k (x1.07)
Performance/W
W-2223
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4