| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i3-10100T


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a0653
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
4.32k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
15.7k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.04k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
7.68k (x0.94)
TOTAL
31.45k
32.73k (x1.04)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
16.59k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
71.1k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
23.26k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
3.86k (x0.56)
TOTAL
104.51k
114.81k (x1.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
24.31k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
22.15k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.14k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.46k (x0.97)
TOTAL
59.68k
60.06k (x1.01)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
101.48k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
98.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
24.28k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
3.86k (x0.56)
TOTAL
243.18k
227.67k (x0.94)

Performance/W
W-2223
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4