| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Glacier Falls
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
4.2k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
17.36k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
7.5k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
23.79k (x2.9)
TOTAL
31.45k
52.85k (x1.68)

Multithread

W-2223

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
22.11k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
108.04k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
56.81k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
36.39k (x5.31)
TOTAL
104.51k
223.36k (x2.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
16.04k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
24.47k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
8.38k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
21.66k (x2.47)
TOTAL
59.68k
70.55k (x1.18)

Multithread

W-2223

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
113.63k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
143.55k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
63.84k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
27.34k (x3.97)
TOTAL
243.18k
348.35k (x1.43)

Performance/W
W-2223
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4