| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
800f82
Core
Glacier Falls
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.41k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
15.96k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
17.42k (x2.13)
TOTAL
31.45k
41.47k (x1.32)

Multithread

W-2223

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
20.88k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
110.37k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
39.25k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.66k (x0.97)
TOTAL
104.51k
177.16k (x1.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
13.83k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
23.16k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.15k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
15.18k (x1.73)
TOTAL
59.68k
57.33k (x0.96)

Multithread

W-2223

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
83.44k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
161.53k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
40.62k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.72k (x0.98)
TOTAL
243.18k
292.31k (x1.2)

Performance/W
W-2223
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4