Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f11
Core
Glacier Falls
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
13.67k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
22.28k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.99k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
15.22k (x1.74)
TOTAL
59.68k
56.16k (x0.94)
Multithread
W-2223
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
81.03k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
145.84k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
39.14k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.79k (x0.99)
TOTAL
243.18k
272.8k (x1.12)
Performance/W
W-2223
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
W-2223
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4