| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Glacier Falls
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.89k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
17.94k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.34k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
6.62k (x0.81)
TOTAL
31.45k
33.79k (x1.07)

Multithread

W-2223

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
15.07k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
66.84k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
19.56k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.54k (x0.95)
TOTAL
104.51k
108.01k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
14.48k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
23.84k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.43k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
5.46k (x0.62)
TOTAL
59.68k
49.21k (x0.82)

Multithread

W-2223

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
54.39k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
88.77k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
20.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
5.48k (x0.8)
TOTAL
243.18k
168.69k (x0.69)

Performance/W
W-2223
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4