| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 3.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f10
Core
Glacier Falls
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
2.63k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
7.84k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
3.63k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
2.93k (x0.36)
TOTAL
31.45k
17.02k (x0.54)

Multithread

W-2223

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
5.77k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
24.15k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
9.28k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
2.83k (x0.41)
TOTAL
104.51k
42.02k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
10.73k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
18.15k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
3.99k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
3.89k (x0.44)
TOTAL
59.68k
36.77k (x0.62)

Multithread

W-2223

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
20.11k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
36.87k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
10.74k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
3.31k (x0.48)
TOTAL
243.18k
71.02k (x0.29)

Performance/W
W-2223
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4