| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
906a4
Core
Glacier Falls
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
7.33k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
18.27k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
12.8k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
13.2k (x1.61)
TOTAL
31.45k
51.61k (x1.64)

Multithread

W-2223

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
29.24k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
83.32k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
54.53k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
4.99k (x0.73)
TOTAL
104.51k
172.07k (x1.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
36.73k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
22.09k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
11.24k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
11.58k (x1.32)
TOTAL
59.68k
81.64k (x1.37)

Multithread

W-2223

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
130.18k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
110.21k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
50.76k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.31k (x0.92)
TOTAL
243.18k
297.46k (x1.22)

Performance/W
W-2223
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4