Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core 2 Duo E7400
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the E7400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 141.3 k points while the E7400 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.6 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 141.3 k points while the E7400 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.6 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
1067a
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2019
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
14.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
25.71k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
2.54k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
6.56k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.73k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
1.83k (x0.31)
TOTAL
21.13k
13.66k (x0.65)
Multithread
Silver 4208
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
5.08k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
13.07k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
5.52k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
1.62k (x0.19)
TOTAL
141.3k
25.29k (x0.18)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
952 points/W
201 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
362 points/W
85 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
1662 points/W
389 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
809 points/GHz
906 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
2344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
983 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
654 points/GHz
TOTAL
6604 points/GHz
4879 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4