| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i7-9850H


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
906ed
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
289.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
4.11k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
15.19k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
5.04k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
11.98k (x2.03)
TOTAL
21.13k
36.32k (x1.72)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
22.68k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
83.77k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
30.37k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
8.55k (x1.01)
TOTAL
141.3k
145.37k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
19.83k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
16.52k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.87k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
9.02k (x1.43)
TOTAL
38.61k
49.24k (x1.28)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
130.19k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
121.44k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
28.05k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
9.62k (x1.12)
TOTAL
311.57k
289.3k (x0.93)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4