| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i7-8665U


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i7-8665U gets 109.7 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
35.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
109.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
14.38k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
13.43k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
2.87k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
4.49k (x0.71)
TOTAL
38.61k
35.19k (x0.91)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
47.22k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
46.99k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
10.08k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.42k (x0.63)
TOTAL
311.57k
109.72k (x0.35)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
672 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
7314 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
2799 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
936 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
7330 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4