| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i7-6600U


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.9 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
406e3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
79.22k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
2.75k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
12.23k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.9k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
5.61k (x0.95)
TOTAL
21.13k
24.48k (x1.16)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
5.23k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
25k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
8.98k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
4.73k (x0.56)
TOTAL
141.3k
43.95k (x0.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
16.72k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
14.7k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.4k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
4.9k (x0.78)
TOTAL
38.61k
39.73k (x1.03)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
33.41k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
31.66k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
8.18k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.97k (x0.69)
TOTAL
311.57k
79.22k (x0.25)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
546 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
398 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5282 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
11684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4