| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
706e5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
28.19k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
22.13k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
10.32k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
14.17k (x2.25)
TOTAL
38.61k
74.82k (x1.94)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
86.39k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
86.22k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
32.99k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.75k (x1.02)
TOTAL
311.57k
214.34k (x0.69)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4