| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-9500


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
906ea
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
4.45k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
18.43k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
5.84k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
12.63k (x2.14)
TOTAL
21.13k
41.34k (x1.96)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
24.75k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
103.1k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
32.43k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
5.56k (x0.65)
TOTAL
141.3k
165.85k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
29.17k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
25.49k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
5.84k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
13.15k (x2.09)
TOTAL
38.61k
73.65k (x1.91)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
166.66k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
146.9k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
34.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.25k (x0.61)
TOTAL
311.57k
352.84k (x1.13)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4