Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-9400F
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906ea
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
27.15k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
23.63k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
5.38k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
11.61k (x1.85)
TOTAL
38.61k
67.77k (x1.76)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
156.61k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
138k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
29.45k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
7.14k (x0.83)
TOTAL
311.57k
331.19k (x1.06)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4