| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-6200U


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-6200U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.8 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
406e3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
81.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
17.06k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
15.24k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.35k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.22k (x0.51)
TOTAL
38.61k
38.87k (x1.01)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
35.68k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
33.68k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
7.74k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
4.09k (x0.47)
TOTAL
311.57k
81.18k (x0.26)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5412 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4