Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0653
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
4k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
14.19k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
4.62k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
11.03k (x1.87)
TOTAL
21.13k
33.84k (x1.6)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
22.77k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
96.59k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
31.65k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
2.45k (x0.29)
TOTAL
141.3k
153.46k (x1.09)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
22k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
19.98k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
4.57k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
11.31k (x1.8)
TOTAL
38.61k
57.85k (x1.5)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
136.69k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
135.25k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
32.76k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
2.48k (x0.29)
TOTAL
311.57k
307.18k (x0.99)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4