Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0652
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
26.37k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
23.91k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
5.57k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
11.68k (x1.86)
TOTAL
38.61k
67.53k (x1.75)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
114.08k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
114.71k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
27.33k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
4.25k (x0.49)
TOTAL
311.57k
260.38k (x0.84)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4